Introduction
For the past decade, we’ve been covering advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning, sounding the alarm that it’s not if it’s when and it’s not when… it’s now. Over the last few years, the news cycle appears to be in full agreement with us. This publication highlights trends and developments in artificial intelligence that are shaping teaching and learning.
We know a few things to be true:
- Every day-to-day, rule-based procedure is able to be automated
- Every sector is growing in complexity
- More work is being done by diverse teams on new problems with smart machines
- Technological innovation is occurring at an exponential rate
AI is a growing web of related technologies that, given ubiquitous use, broke through to the popular press in 2016. When Google’s DeepMind beat the world champion Go player in March and self-driving cars showed up in Pittsburgh in September, it became obvious that this new cluster of technologies was moving fast and had broad implications. In late 2022 and early 2023, OpenAI started an avalanche of AI announcements with the public beta version of ChatGPT, rapidly followed by GPT-4 and numerous other iterations of Natural Language Processing tools. Everyone was amazed at the believability of these products. The future arrived.
So what does this mean for us? “Can we adapt fast enough?” That’s the big question. Harvard’s Erik Brynjolfsson thinks that “they already are much smarter than us at many things”.
Homo techne could be translated as “the technological human” or “the human defined by technology.” In using this term, you are arguing that our ability to create and use tools, machines, and other technologies.
Impromptu
What does this have to do with teaching and learning?
We’d be lying if we said anything other than “everything”. At its core, Artificial Intelligence will cause us to question the nature of intelligence which will not only change what we measure but also what we value.
A few of the most notable and urgent impacts are: every field is computational and dynamic and AI competes for attention, thereby requiring renewed values agreements and additional community conversations.
The education sector must respond by doing some, or all, of the following:
- Integrate design thinking & data science into K-12 curriculum.
- Build, measure and develop human skills: social-emotional, agency, creativity, and entrepreneurial mindset .
- Create community agreements: a set of agreed upon priorities, values, skills.
- Teach/practice digital discernment/ethics and renew a commitment to digital literacy for all learners.
My definition of Homo techne assumes that every individual human, sapiens or ante-sapiens, with or without an AI copilot, makes choices. Those choices, in the aggregate, shape what is experienced by each succeeding generation.
Impromptu
What does AI think about AI’s impact on education?
In his recent book Impromptu, Reid Hoffman asked GPT4 how AI could support students around the world in educational pursuits. Here is the exchange:
Reid: GPT4, can you write the next 300 words from your perspective as a large language model and describe how you could extend the Bridge/NewGlobe tablets into a tool to help tens of millions of students throughout Africa and Asia?
GPT4: As a large language model, I can help by enhancing the quality, personalization, and scalability of their learning content. Here is how I would do it:
First, I would use natural language processing and computer vision to analyze the existing lesson scripts, test scores, teacher feedback, and student performance data from Bridge/NewGlobe schools. I would identify the key learning objectives, concepts, skills, and assessments for each grade level and subject, as well as the common misconceptions, gaps, and difficulties that students face. I would also detect the linguistic, cultural, and contextual variations that affect the relevance and appropriateness of the content for different regions and settings.
Second, I would use natural language generation and computer graphics to create new and improved lesson scripts, activities, exercises, and multimedia resources that are aligned with the learning objectives and adapted to the local needs and preferences of the students and teachers. I would use techniques such as question generation, answer extraction, feedback provision, and adaptive sequencing to make the content more interactive, responsive, and personalized.
Third, I would use natural language understanding and speech recognition to monitor and support the delivery and use of the content by the teachers and students. I would also use techniques such as speech-to-text, text-to-speech, and machine translation to enable the users to communicate with the content and with each other in their preferred languages and modes.